PhD / Research · Scientific Writing and Open Science

Reporting guidelines

Reporting guidelines structure transparent descriptions of how a study was designed, conducted, analyzed and interpreted. They improve auditability but do not guarantee methodological quality.

Open interactive lesson & self-check ↗

Reporting guidelines — learning map

Original conceptual SVG · scalable
LABELED RELATIONSHIP MAP · SCHEMATIC, NOT TO SCALEMatch guideline to designappropriate checklistReport protocol and deviationsmake changes visibleDescribe uncertaintyavoid selective resultsShare responsiblyreproducibility and privacyReporting guidelinesKEY RELATIONSHIPS

Original schematic relationship map for this topic; relationships are organized for study, not intended as an anatomical depiction or a diagnostic algorithm.

Concept 01

Match guideline to design

CONSORT is used for randomized trials, STROBE for observational studies and PRISMA for systematic reviews, with extensions for specialized designs.

Concept 02

Report protocol and deviations

Clearly distinguish prespecified analyses from exploratory work and document amendments or changes to outcomes and methods.

Concept 03

Describe uncertainty

Report effect estimates, intervals, adverse outcomes and missing-data handling where relevant, not just statistically significant comparisons.

Concept 04

Share responsibly

Data and code may improve reproducibility when permissions, consent and confidentiality allow; restricted access can be necessary for human data.

Education / safety note: Following a checklist is not a substitute for an ethically and scientifically sound study or for journal-specific instructions.

Reference and next reading

Explore the original curriculum and publisher-hosted resources for full-depth reading; this note is an original schematic introduction, not an exhaustive chapter.

Official / publisher source: PubMed ↗Official / publisher source: PubMed ↗Official / publisher source: PubMed ↗